<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pepsi new logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zamplr.com/design/pepsi-new-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zamplr.com/design/pepsi-new-logo/</link>
	<description>Read Reviews and Buy online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.zamplr.com/design/pepsi-new-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-23401</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zamplr.com/?p=243#comment-23401</guid>
		<description>No...no...no... I don&#039;t happen to like Pepsi, but thats subjective taste. I do like their packaging. This is profit-margin driven stupidity. Their current badge has a Raymond Loewy type aesthetic to it, the curve whispers of golden spirals, the duo-tone contrast has extra intruige because the &#039;frame&#039; is high contrast white, and therefore more attractive to the eye than any other part, but clearly not the focus, also a blue &#039;segment&#039; and then the blue background tends to confuse the mind, thus bringing reassurement when the clarity of the word &quot;pepsi&quot; is arrived at. The whole experience is remeniscient of a pleasant soda experience, and hence effective. These new logos lack any subliminal connection to pro-sport league logos, they&#039;re varying dimensions lack exactly what you want in a logo. Wholesome simplicity, and repetition to build up a watermark in the mind, strongly signalling the same message over and over. The different dimensions look sloppy, and fail to represent continuity and consistency. This is an a**-backwards plan to slice a slighty higher profit margin by being trendy, but do people consider soda labels when trying to be &#039;hep&#039; anymore? No. All pepsico is going to accomplish here is to breed brand confusion, lose customers, and sever their sales bottom line from over half a century of tenured following. BAD IDEA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;no&#8230;no&#8230; I don&#8217;t happen to like Pepsi, but thats subjective taste. I do like their packaging. This is profit-margin driven stupidity. Their current badge has a Raymond Loewy type aesthetic to it, the curve whispers of golden spirals, the duo-tone contrast has extra intruige because the &#8216;frame&#8217; is high contrast white, and therefore more attractive to the eye than any other part, but clearly not the focus, also a blue &#8217;segment&#8217; and then the blue background tends to confuse the mind, thus bringing reassurement when the clarity of the word &#8220;pepsi&#8221; is arrived at. The whole experience is remeniscient of a pleasant soda experience, and hence effective. These new logos lack any subliminal connection to pro-sport league logos, they&#8217;re varying dimensions lack exactly what you want in a logo. Wholesome simplicity, and repetition to build up a watermark in the mind, strongly signalling the same message over and over. The different dimensions look sloppy, and fail to represent continuity and consistency. This is an a**-backwards plan to slice a slighty higher profit margin by being trendy, but do people consider soda labels when trying to be &#8216;hep&#8217; anymore? No. All pepsico is going to accomplish here is to breed brand confusion, lose customers, and sever their sales bottom line from over half a century of tenured following. BAD IDEA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
